Skip to content

Keeping Good Company: Charitable Donations Through Your Company

Donate

In my last article, I spoke at length about how to maximize the tax benefits of your personal charitable donations so your money goes further. Today’s offering takes this one step further – what if you’re actually better off having your company make the donation instead? Read on and see for yourself.

The Basics 

Unlike when you donate personally, corporate donations generate a tax deduction rather than a tax credit. Thus, the amount you give to good causes in any tax year is deducted from that company’s taxable income rather than generating a non-refundable tax credit, which is how things work if you give out of your own pocket rather than through the corporate coffers.

How that translates towards your bottom line depends on a bunch of things. First, if your company is an active small business taxed at the small business rate, which might be as low as 11%, then you’re only essentially getting back $11 per $100 donated. On the other hand, if your company is making money hand over fist and you are earning in excess of the small business limit ($500,000 in most provinces, although this limit may be reduced if you are earning investment income in excess of $50,000 under the new passive income rules), your deduction may climb to 27%, which is the current B.C. rate.

Finally, if you donate through a holding company instead, you might reap your biggest savings of all, as investment income is taxed at over 50% in most provinces (i.e. 50.67% in B.C. and Alberta at the date I type these words). Admittedly, a good chunk of that 50% is potentially refundable anyway if you flow out enough in taxable dividends to shareholders, but you would have still lost about 20% to the tax man all the same, plus whatever extra tax gets paid personally by the people receiving those dividends.

As an added wrinkle, the government also forgives any unrealized capital gains on publicly traded investments your company donates in-kind, just like they do if you donate those securities personally. What many people don’t realize however, is that there is an additional tax advantage your company reaps by donating appreciated securities in-kind that can vastly compound your savings.

For those of you who have survived my previous articles on small business taxation (see my website at colinsritchie.com if you’re a glutton for punishment or are one of those people like me who are strangely obsessed with all things taxation), you might remember something called the “capital dividend account” or the “CDA” if you have a thing for acronyms. The CDA is a notional account tracked by the government (and hopefully your accountant) that tells you how much money your company can pay out to you as tax-free capital dividends.  In the normal course of things, 50% of any capital gains realized inside your company can be paid out to you directly through the CDA minus any capital losses from that year.  If you donate an appreciated security to the Save the Large Mammals Fund or a similar charitable entity instead, however, 100% of the gain goes into the CDA instead, rather than just 50%!In other words, if donating a $25,000. security with $10,000 in unrealized gains, you get:

  • a $25,000 charitable donation deduction that could reduce your holdco’s tax bill by perhaps $12,500 or more;
  • forgiveness of $10,000 in capital gains, which might represent a further savings of about $2,500, minus any portion that is later refunded to the company if it pays out enough taxable dividends to others, although those people will also need to pay tax on those dividends;
  • the right to pay out $10,000 rather than just $5,000 from your company to yourself or other shareholders as a tax-free capital dividend, which could potentially offer further tax savings of almost 45% of this additional $5,000 in B.C. or $2,232 if the person getting this payment would otherwise be in the highest tax bracket.

Crunching the numbers, this translates into about $17,200 in upfront combined personal and corporate tax savings. Moreover, donating corporately also reduces the potential tax bill on death for your holding company (or your active business as well, for that matter) and allows you to use more of your personal money for other things or perhaps means that you don’t have to flow out as much in dividends or salary in order to fund a personal donation.

There are some limits to what you can donate corporately, however. In particular, your company cannot deduct more than 75% of its income for that year, although any unused contributions can be carried forward and deducted over any of the ensuing 5 tax years. Accordingly, if you have your heart set on a large donation in one particular year inside your holdco but don’t have the taxable income to write it all off, you might consider triggering a bunch of additional capital gains inside the company that year if possible. This can create the additional taxable income you need to claim a larger deduction asap and, as an added bonus, you can pay out 50% of the extra gains you trigger tax-free as a capital dividend. As the cherry on top, this also helps reduce your eventual corporate tax bill at death by decreasing what’s left inside your company at death by taking out extra money now.

As a final thought, for those of you who haven’t read my previous article on personal donations, check out organizations like CHIMP or ask your stock broker if they have any donor-advised funds they offer. Both allow investors to donate in-kind to a new investment account and receive a donation receipt at the time the money is transferred into the account. Once inside this new account, the donors can make cash donations to their charities of choice when the time is right. Donors still get credit for their donation based on the value at the time of transfer into the new account, plus forgiveness of the unrealized capital gains. This may be particularly useful for donors who plan on making numerous gifts over the course of a year to several different charities for either smaller amounts or to charities that don’t have the infrastructure to handle in-kind donations!

Corporate vs. Personal Donations – Which is Better?

Should you donate personally or corporately? Ultimately, as us lawyers and financial types like to say, it depends. If you are personally in a relatively low tax bracket, particularly if you don’t have a lot of corporate assets, you are likely still better off donating personally. That’s because 45.8% donation credit you get personally in B.C. on all but the first $200 of your donation is probably more than the tax rate you pay on your last dollar of income that year. Thus, even if you have to flow out more salary or dividends in order to come up with the cash for your donation, the extra tax you pay on the additional withdrawals will be lower than your charitable donation credit. In other words, claiming a 11% or 27% deduction in your operating company instead getting  a 45.8% donation credit personally makes donating corporately not such a wonderful thing in that scenario.

If you donated from your holdco rather than an active business instead, you still might be better off donating personally if you’re personally in the lower tax brackets. Although there is that 50.67% investment tax rate on interest income and the 50% taxable portion of capital gains, along with a 38.67% tax on investment dividends in B.C., all but about 20% of the 50.67% is refundable, along with 100% of the 38.67% provided that enough taxable income is paid out to shareholders that year. Noting that shareholders do get credit for the investment tax paid corporately through both the small business and enhanced dividend tax credits, at the end of the day, the total tax bill paid corporately and personally on the investment income earned inside the company is designed to be about the same or slightly more than if the shareholder earned that income directly and was taxed on it accordingly. As a result, if the 45.8%  personal donate credit is higher than your marginal tax rate for interest or salary (not dividends) after you’ve withdrawn enough corporate dollars to fund your gift, then you are often better donating personally.

When trying to figure out what’s best for you, here are some of the key factors to consider:

  • Is the combined tax rate you and your company pay on the income it needs to pay you to make the gift less than the 45.8% charitable donation rate (or whatever is the going rate in your province) you can claim if donating personally. If you are in the highest bracket in at least some provinces, your personal donation rate climbs to 49.8% on the amount of your income that would be taxed at this high rate. If you are over 65, you will also need to determine how much of your OAS pension you might lose if you need to increase your income to fund the gift;
  • Do you have substantial unrealized gains in your company or personally? Which of your investments have the highest percentage gains, as those investments will often be the ones that you can save the most by donating? All the same, you would still need to compare your personal and corporate tax rates at that time and also take into account the extra money you can pull out from your company tax-free through the CDA when donating corporately when making this decision;
  • How much do you have in your holding company and are you expecting a big capital gains bill on your company shares at death? If so, you might wish to donate corporately when planning ahead, particularly if you donate investments with large gains in-kind so you can withdraw additional tax-free capital dividends as a result of your donation;
  • Would reducing the size of your corporate investment portfolio help any active business you still own get more of its income taxed at the small business rate (i.e. perhaps 11% instead of 27% for B.C.)? Now that any investment income exceeding $50,000 will reduce how much active income gets taxed at the small business rate as a result of the Liberal’s new passive income rules, donating corporate securities producing a lot of taxable investment income or which would otherwise be subject to a big capital gains bill when you sell might have the added benefit of saving your active business some extra dollars either in the following tax year or further down the road.
  • Do you have enough income personally or corporately to allow you to deduct your planned gift that year? Whether if personally or corporately, you can only get credit for donations up to 75% of the taxable income of the person or corporation making the donation. Of course, it is possible to donate a bit from both sources if necessary. Just be careful about pushing yourself into a higher personal tax bracket in order to be able to deduct your gift asap, as that often is a mistake;
  • What are your general plans for your money going forward? I also view personal money as more valuable than corporate dollars, as it is more flexible and can be accessed and gifted far more easily and with less tax consequences a lot of the time.

Conclusion 

At the end of the day, charitable gifting is far more about helping those in need than in saving money. Ultimately, regardless of how you structure your gift, you will still be out of pocket as a result of your generosity. If someone presents you with a fancy brochure that says otherwise, run for the nearest exit! All the same, gifting intelligently can help you to give more or reduce the financial toll of your good deeds. A few extra moments now can have a huge impact on you and your charities’ bottom line, both now and for years to come.

Selected Charitable Donation Ideas: Making Your Gifts Count for More

c30dbef7b1d2bf22b2e85fc921bd297a

I began writing this article several thousand feet above the ground while jetting home to see my family in Ontario stuffed full to the brim with Christmas spirit, although it’s taken me another few months and another plane trip to finish things off. I always applaud those of you with the means and inclination to donate your hard-earned cash to whatever charitable organizations resonate within you. To help in this pursuit, I am writing this article to either put more cash back in your pocket or to allow you to gift even more by explaining some tax-advantaged ways of best helping those in need.

The Basics

To begin, here is a hopefully brief overview of the tax relief you get when you make personal tax donations to your charity of choice. In a Christmas-coloured nutshell, if you donate in B.C., you get 20.06% of your money back as a non-refundable tax credit on the first $200 you gift per year and 45.8% on the rest of your donation unless your income in the year of the gift (line 260 of your tax return) puts you in the highest federal tax bracket (about $210,000 for 2019). In that case, you get a 49.8% credit equal to the amount your taxable income exceeds that threshold. In plain speak, say you donated $50,000 in a year that your net taxable income was otherwise $250,000. You’d get a 20.06% credit on the first $200, a 45.8% credit for the next $9,800 and a 49.8% credit on the last $40,000 (i.e. $250,000 – $40,000) for total tax savings of about $24,486.

There are other rules that apply for donating at death or beyond the grave that have been covered by others that I won’t get into today, other than to say that the donation limit goes up to 100% of your income in the year of death, which can also be applied to your previous year’s tax return if necessary. You are also able to carry forward unused donations for up to an additional 5 years in some cases.

When looking at when to give, it’s important to remember that  the deadline for personal donations is the calendar year end if you want to claim your refund as soon as possible. Thus, even though you have a few additional months each year to make RRSP contributions each year as December glides to an end, you have to get your act together by New Year’s Eve if you’re hoping to get your tax refund for new charitable donations around the same time as you have to pay for this year’s spring break.

With no further ado, here are some tips if you are looking to make donations personally during your lifetime. I’ll write another article (hopefully well before the next major holiday) talking about how things work if you donate corporately and some things to consider when debating between personal and corporate donations:

  • As the charitable donation credit is, well, a credit, there is often no benefit to having the wealthier spouse claim the relief afforded by their combined largesse in most cases, as tax credits produce the same refund for either spouse, regardless of tax bracket if neither is in the top tax bracket. Thus, assuming the lower income spouse has enough taxable income to use up the tax credit (as this credit can only be used to reduce your tax bill to $0 rather than getting additional funds back beyond this point) and the total family donations that year weren’t more than 75% of the lower-income spouse’s income, it often makes sense for the lower income spouse to claim the tax reward if the plan is to reinvest. This is because any earnings on the invested refund will be taxed at a lower rate in that spouse’s hands. Thus, charitable donations can also be a tool for income splitting if the gifts are large enough. This is not a universal rule, however. For example, if having the higher income spouse make the donations would allow him or her to increase RRSP or Spousal RRSP contributions and get a bigger tax refund since (s)he is in a higher tax bracket, then the spouse with the bigger paycheque might want to claim the credit instead in some cases. Likewise, if the wealthier spouse is in the highest tax bracket and the other is not, then you might want the spouse with the higher income to claim at least as much of their combined donations that generate an extra 4% in tax savings.
  • If you don’t need the credit to get your taxable income to $0 that year, don’t claim any more than you need to get to that point, as any excess amount donated will be squandered just like an unused holiday gift card.

 

  • If you aren’t usually in the top federal tax bracket but are in 2019 or down the road, you’ll get an extra 4% in tax savings if you give in that year on whatever is less – the total amount of your donation that year above $200 or the amount your taxable income exceeds $210,000 (or whatever that number happens to be going forward) above $200 in that year. Thus consider making really big donations at that time, which for some of us might be death. Likewise, if you want to donate now when you’re not in the highest tax bracket but should be next year, consider not claiming all your donations until then if your income for next year minus any additional donations you plan on making then would still leave you in the highest tax bracket.

 

  • Continuing with my gift card analogy, if you don’t have enough taxable income to use up your full donation credit that year without triggering additional taxes, such as by making extra RRSP withdrawals, it could save you more in the long run if you carry the credit forward instead of triggering extra income this year at a really high rate. A charitable donation credit is like a gift card for a flat amount – if you use both strategically, you can maximize your savings. Just like you can perhaps have enough of a $500 gift card left over to purchase an extra sweater set or leopard-print boxer shorts if you shop during a Christmas blowout, you can often stretch the value of your charitable donation credit if you use it strategically rather than just creating extra income asap just to use it up. Think of $50,000 in charitable donations as the right to get back about $24,486 in taxes using the example I provided earlier for a Vancouver donor. By using up the credit while in lower tax brackets, you may be able to ultimately pull out more money from your RRSP, RRIF, corporation etc. tax-free even though you might have to wait a bit longer to get your savings.  On the other hand, if you can trigger extra capital gains, pull out more RRSP/RRIF money or get extra salary or dividends from your company without going into a significantly higher tax bracket than you expect to see over the next few years, then go for it so you have more to reinvest as soon as possible.

 

  • Donate in-kind rather than in cash. Many generous investor types already know that the government forgives the unrealized capital gains bill when you donate publicly traded securities from non-registered accounts rather sending money to your charity instead. Moreover, you’re still credited with a donation equal to the fair market value of your donated security on the date it is gifted. Accordingly, even if you love everything in your portfolio, consider donating shares with high unrealized capital gains to your charity of choice rather than stroking a cheque. You can always use the cash you would have otherwise gifted instead to buy back that cool junior mining stock your brother told you about. When the dust settles, your charity would still have funds equal to the value of your shares upon donation minus perhaps some admin fees, you’d have a tax receipt for that same value as if you’d paid cash. Even better, if you have repurchased your mining shares with the cash you would have otherwise given, these shares no longer have any unsightly unrealized capital gains attached to them. This strategy works particularly well for any shares you may have received “for free” for an insurance company when it demutualized, since the entire value of the shares might otherwise be taxed exclusively as a capital gain.

 

  • If gifting over the long term, consider making deferred capital gain investments now to be donated down the road. If you’re looking to take the donate in-kind strategy one step further, consider buying investments like REITs and corporate class mutual funds that pay mostly return of capital. Return of capital or (“ROC”), which is treated like a refund of some of your original investment for tax purposes and is tax-free until you’ve received back all of your original investment.  Thus, you can keep all or almost all of any payments you receive along the way but also avoid that day of reckoning that often comes with these investments later by donating them once you’ve gotten back most of your original investment. In the normal course of things, investments that pay ROC usually have big capital gains looming at sale, even if they haven’t really increased significantly in value, as each ROC payment along the way is subtracted from the original purchase price for determining the capital gain upon sale or disposition. As a result, a $10,000 investment that pays $600 in ROC each year and doesn’t increase in value would otherwise be subject to a $6,000 capital gain in 10 years ($10,000  value at purchase minus 10 years of $600 payments or an adjusted cost base of $4,000). Donating these shares or units instead could mean making a 6% yearly profit for a decade without ever paying a penny in tax, since the capital gain is forgiven at donation!

 

  • Consider donating through organizations like CHIMP, through a donor-advised fund or similar entities. Although donating in-kind directly to your charity of choice sounds good in theory, it might not always work so well in practice if your charity doesn’t have the infrastructure to sell your donated shares or if your donation strategy focuses on gifting smaller amounts to many organizations rather than writing larger cheques thus making the “hassle factor” of making many donations in-kind becomes larger than the benefits. By the same token, investors donating in-kind can miss out when their charity needs money now but the stock they were planning to gift has suddenly decreased in value by 20%.

Organizations like CHIMP or donor-advised funds can help solve these problems.  They act as “middlemen” – instead of gifting directly to charities, donors give their stocks to these organizations instead and they provide donors with the immediate charitable receipt equal to the investment’s value at that time, and capital gains relief.  The gifted securities donated go into a new account the donor manages through CHIMP and can either be immediately be converted to cash and forwarded to your charity or charities of choice, or it can stay invested. You might like this second option if:

 

  • the market is at a high and you feel like now is the best time to maximize the size of your donation by disposing of the stock now even if you aren’t sure how you wish to distribute the money. Once inside an organization like CHIMP, you could also rebalance into something less volatile as well in order to protect your gains. In other words, if worried about a correction, you could rebalance this part of your portfolio after it is in the middleman’s hands so that this can be done capital gains free but so the capital is still protected from a stock plunge;

 

  • you want a large tax credit this year but would rather pay the money to charities in chunks over perhaps the next 5 years. Accordingly, rather than converting the donated investment to cash, you may want your investment to keep growing going forward so that there is more to donate when it is finally time to give; and

 

  • You want the convenience of perhaps making a single in-kind donation once a year but having a ready supply of tax-advantaged assets you can quickly liquidate and use to gift to multiple smaller charities when appropriate while still having your money generate income and gains for your charities along the way;

It is important to realize that there will likely be (usually minor) transaction costs for transferring the asset through an organization like CHIMP. Moreover, you do not receive any more tax credits for any income or gains earned by investments once they are in the middleman’s hands – you only get credit for the value at the time of donation, but the benefits of both being able to donate in-kind rather than cash and the ability to get your tax credit perhaps years sooner than when your charity actually gets the full value of your gift can usually easily offset these drawbacks.

  • Consider buying a life insurance policy for your charity of choice and donating it to them at death. This strategy doesn’t get you any write-off now but does provide a heck of a refund when the death benefit is paid out at your passing, as the full amount paid gets tax relief. This strategy keeps your options open should you want to change charities down the road, if you want to leave the money in full or in part to family instead or need it for other purposes.  For many of us, the biggest tax bill will come at our death or the death of our spouse, if later.  As  I explained in laborious detail earlier, you might get an extra 4% deduction at that time if you aren’t otherwise someone who is in the highest tax bracket, noting that many of us visit this unhappy place only during the year of death.  Our biggest tax bills usually come in the year of our death or, if we have a spouse, when the last of us dies. Accordingly, arranging to have a humungous tax credit at the same time as when faced with a gigantic tax bill can be a wonderful thing, particularly if it provides you with an extra 4% in tax savings. Some people target having enough insurance to wipe the truly daunting tax bill that can also go along with large RRIF balances at death.

 

  • Donate old and unnecessary life insurance policies during your lifetime. Have a policy taken out decades ago to protect your spouse and family that is no longer necessary and / or too expensive?  Want to fund a large gift to your charity later but get tax relief now? Consider donating it a new or existing life insurance policy to a charity. You will get a charitable receipt equal to its fair market value today, which could be a lot more than its cash value, if donating a policy that has been around for a long time, particularly if you are in poor health. Think of it this way – if a stranger has a life policy that pays $1,000,000 at death, a $40,000 cash value, and that poor soul will likely only live for 3 years, what would you pay to buy that policy as an investment, knowing that a million dollars tax-free would be coming your way likely within the next 36 months? I strongly suspect a lot more than just the $40,000 you’d receive if the policy was cashed in early. In any event, at the time of donation, the donor gets a tax receipt for the policy’s fair market value but only pays tax on the taxable portion of the $40,000 cash surrender value, using the $1,000,000 policy from my example. The taxable portion will vary from policy to policy and determined by your life insurance company. Just keep in mind that once you’ve donated the policy, it’s no longer in your control.

If our fictional policy had a fair market value of $600,000, then the donor could potentially use the credit to withdraw the rest of his RRIF tax-free and perhaps better enjoy the remainder of his retirement and his charity would still get $1,000,000 tax-free at his death, although it would need to either pay any remaining premiums owing on the policy unless the donor continued to do so directly, and getting an additional tax credit for doing so, or perhaps using some of the existing cash value of the policy to keep the policy in force even if this reduced the eventual payout at death. Although this donor wouldn’t get as big of a tax credit than if he gifted at death, perhaps a smaller tax credit now would be more useful for him, assuming he didn’t just cancel the policy for the $40,000 cash surrender value instead!

Conclusion

Ultimately, we don’t donate for tax reasons but because we want to make a difference in the world around us. Accordingly, many of us do not take tax considerations into account when giving, let alone taking the time to understand the tax nuances. It is my hope that this article helps fill in a few of the blanks, whether you ultimately give a little more because you can do so more tax-efficiently or whether you use the money saved for your own family.

Financial Planning for Millennials -Podcast

e6heu6nu21pz

Hi all, I just wanted to let you know that my first podcast is now available  on itunes for your listening pleasure (I hope). As many of you know, I am a contributing editor to Canadian Moneysaver Magazine and am a huge proponent of financial literacy for reasons too numerous to iterate in one short paragraph. I was interviewed by the Magazine on the subject of financial planning for Millennials for about 45 minutes. Anyway, the link is attached below – happy listening and do be sure to pass this along to anyone else that you think might be interested.

https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-moneysaver-podcast/id1362731420?mt=2#episodeGuid=8d37845b03ce4078af17b26efb50b13b

Corporate Investment Income: Navigating the Rules of the Tax Game

investement_opportunity_nigeria_1352685

Introduction

If you’ve made it through my first two articles, you’ve hopefully learned a few important things about how Canadian-Controlled Private Companies (“CCPCs”) are taxed. My first article talks about how profits from an active business are taxed inside your operating company, whether you take it salary, dividends or keep it in your company for a rainy day, showing how unincorporated and corporate business owners pay a similar amount of tax if withdrawing each year’s profits as they go in their own names.  It also explains, on the other hand, why business owners who incorporate can still be far better off than their sole proprietor pals if they have excess earnings that they can spend inside their business to grow their earnings or to invest in the stock market.

My second effort began the discussion regarding how this extra dough you’ve set aside for the future gets taxed when it’s invested in the stock market rather than spent growing your active business. Key points include the fact that you pay a lot more tax corporately on investment dollars than you do when your CCPC turns a profit selling widgets, that a bunch of this tax is refundable, and that your company can pay you both eligible and small business dividends from both investment and business income.

Today’s offering attempts to talk about each of the three main types of investment income you might earn corporately and how they get taxed first in your company’s hands and then in yours when making withdrawals from the corporate coffers. I then try to tie these together so you can ultimately get an idea of how much money you’d actually get to keep for groceries or to fund luxury vacations after you and your company have both paid their share of the tax bill. Not only is this vital for budgeting and tax planning – knowing how much of each type of investment income stays in your own hands net of taxes can help guide your investment decisions as well. When looking at investments, I’m far less interested in my raw rate of return than how much I get to keep after I’ve made the tax man happy!

To apply the information in this article to your own situation, you’ll need to use the corporate and personal tax rates for your province of choice. Here are a couple links to get you started. The examples I use in this article use British Columbia rates as of July 2018:

Eligible Dividends

When your company owns investments that pay out eligible dividends from publicly-traded Canadian companies, which I’ll call “portfolio dividends” to distinguish them from the eligible capital and small business / ineligible dividends that your company pays out to you, things look pretty bad at first glance – there are potentially three levels of tax paid on the same dividend dollar that might leave you wondering at first glance why you didn’t just pay it all to the government in the first place. When the dust settles, however, things work out pretty well – ultimately, if your company passes along all the portfolio dividends it receives each year, its’ shareholders will be left with as about as much post-tax dollars as they’d have if they’d earned these portfolio dividends directly. In fact, families that can still income-split corporate money under the new rules, might be substantially better off than an family where the money is taxed in the hands of single investor!

First the bad news. Assume your CCPC owns shares in RBC and gets a cheque for $73 in eligible dividends. In order to write this cheque, RBC would have had to earn about $100 before tax at 27% to be left with $73 to pay out to your company. Your CPP then pays 38.33% on this $73. And, if you’re in the highest personal tax bracket, you may need to pay another 34.2% or more on the eligible dividend your company passes along to you! At first blush, some of you doing some quick math might gasp in horror when you realize that these rates total about 99.5%!

Now for the silver lining, and it is a big one and has many parts – the 38.33% tax charged in the company is totally refundable if the company pays out as many eligible dividends to shareholders as it receives in portfolio dividends. Put differently, this 38.33% tax charged to your company is more like an interest-free loan to the government that is designed to encourage you to pay out portfolio dividends when you earn them rather than reinvesting them corporately. Although you can still keep the money in the company if you want (and might, such as if you think might be able to pay them out in later years when you expect to be in a substantially lower tax bracket) your company will be out of pocket the 38.33% tax the meantime and won’t earn any interest on it. Any of this refundable tax still owing to your company is tracked by your accountant in a notional account known as the Eligible Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand or “ERDTOH”. At the same time, your accountant will also track how many eligible dividends your company can pay out in the future to recapture these tax dollars.

Just as importantly, the 34.2% rate you might have to pay personally is charged against only the $73 you actually received rather than the $100 actually received by RBC in the first place. Thus, think of it as a 24.966% tax on the original $100, which sounds a lot better than 34.2% tax on what you actually receive.  Finally, I’ve picked a taxpayer in the highest tax bracket, which is a bit north of $200,000 in taxable income per year in B.C. For people in lower tax brackets, the rates are far less. In fact, someone in B.C.  in the lowest tax bracket ($39,676 or less) would actually get a tax refundof $4.99 on that $73 dividend. For these taxpayers, they would get to keep almost 78% of the original $100 earned by RBC after pocketing their tax refund!

For those of you wondering about why these low-income taxpayers are getting a refund, I suggest reviewing my earlier article discussing how business income is taxed, as the same principals apply. Ultimately, any shareholder getting $73 in eligible dividends from the company will be taxed on $100 (i.e. the actual amount received of $73 is “grossed up” by 38% more than it really receives so the taxpayer is taxed on the original $100 received by RBC). They then get a tax credit for a good portion of the $27 tax already paid on that money by RBC, which is more than low income earners would have paid if they’d earned $100 in business income directly, thus entitling them to a refund.

To make life slightly simpler for the rest of the article, I’ll just use the effective tax rate on the actual amounts of dividends received rather than going through the more detailed calculation. In other words, I will use a short-form method of calculating the tax bill that just focuses on the tax rate charged against the actual dividend you receive rather than going through the “gross up” calculations, calculating the tax bill at that marginal tax rate as income and then applying the dividend tax credit. Again, read my earlier article if you’re a glutton for punishment and want to do things the hard way.

Finally, although my example assumes RBC originally earned $100 and a $73 portfolio dividend payment, my calculations below will assume that your company receives $100 which would have required RBC to earn about $136.98 before taxes to generate that larger payout. I needed to use the $73 dividend example to show you how our tax system works. Now, I need to use a $100 dividend example to provide a fair comparison to how much of that you’d get to keep when earning $100 in portfolio dividends compared to $100 in interest or capital gains.

Summary: If your CCPC earns $100 in portfolio dividends, it will be taxed on this amount at 38.33% for a corporate tax bill of $38.33 unless it pays out $100 in taxable dividends that year. The entire $38.33 is credited to the ERDTOH Account and is recouped when your company pays out $100 in taxable dividends ($38.33 x 2.61).

For someone in B.C. making $100,000, their tax bill on $100 in eligible dividends is $18.31 based on a 18.31% tax rate on the actual eligible dividends received. Thus, after receiving their tax refund in recognition to the tax already paid on the $100 by RBC, the tax payer pockets $80.85 (or slightly less because I did some rounding on the corporate calculations) after his personal and company tax bill.

Comparison: If the shareholder instead received $100 in eligible dividends directly from RBC while earning $100,000, he would get to keep $80.85, which is about the same, ignoring rounding, as if the portfolio dividend had been earned by the company instead and paid out to him as an eligible dividend.

Interest

The tax for interest income inside a CCPC is calculated in a different way than for portfolio dividends, although there are several similarities. The tax rate is a disconcerting 50.67% but, like for portfolio dividends, a good portion of this tax is refunded when it pays out small business / ineligible dividends to shareholders. Note: until next year, you can also get back the refundable portion of your interest dollars even when paying out more tax-friendly eligible dividends generated from business income taxed at 27%.

Going forward, the refundable portion of the tax paid on interest, rental income and the taxable portion of capital gains, etc. will be tracked by your accountant and your friends at the CRA in another notional account called the Ineligible Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand or “NRDTOH” Account. For now, both this account and the ERDTOH account discussed previously are combined to form a single RDTOH account.

To recapture the refundable tax paid to the government, your company will need to pay out 2.61 times the amount of tax owing to it in ineligible dividends. Put another way, it gets back $1 in the money owing to it for every $2.61 it pays out in ineligible dividends. Unfortunately, while people receiving the ineligible dividends do get a tax credit they can use to reduce their personal tax bill owing on this money, it is not nearly as attractive as the tax credit earned on eligible dividends.

Perhaps more unpleasantly,  there is another big difference between how portfolio dividends and interest income etc. get taxed inside your company. While you can get back all of the 38.33% tax paid on portfolio dividends, your CCPC will probably be out about 20% of its interest earnings even after recouping the refundable portion. Thus, of the $50.67 tax bill otherwise owing by your company on each $100 in interest, only $30.67 is refundable.

Summary: If your CCPC earns $100 in interest income next year, it will be initially left with $49.33 after taxes, unless it pays out lots of ineligible dividends to its shareholders. Of the $50.67 paid in taxes, $30.67 is refundable and is credited to the NRDTOH Account. If the company pays out about $80in eligible dividends ($30.67 x 2.61), it gets back the entire $30.67 in refundable tax, but has still paid about $20 in taxes.

If the shareholder was earning $100,000 in total income, the $80 he receives in ineligible dividends is taxed at 30.38% for a tax bill of $24.30, leaving the taxpayer with $55.70 or slightly less after rounding.

Comparison: If this shareholder had instead earned $100 in interest income personally, he would pay 38.29% tax leaving behind $61.71 in after-tax profits or about $6 more than when earned through the company.

Capital Gains

Just like if earned personally, only 50% of the total gain is taxed inside your company. The other 50% is tax-free and also gets paid out tax-free to shareholders through yet another notional government account called the “Capital Dividend Account” or “CDA”. For example, if you made a $10,000 gain, $5,000 would be credited to the CDA and could be paid out as a tax-free capital dividend while the other $5,000 would be taxed in the CCPC like interest income as a “taxable capital gain”.

On the other hand, if you’d also had a $2,000 capital loss that year, this would be offset against your gain, in the same way as if you’d earned the gain and loss in your open account. As a result, although your company would only have to pay tax on $4,000 after deducting $1,000 in taxable losses from the taxable $5,000 capital gain, it would also only get a $4,000 credit in its capital dividend account since the $1,000 in non-taxable losses are also deducted from the $5,000 in non-taxable gains.

Finally, if your company has a balance in its CDA that it carries forward that can be used to pay out tax-free loot in future years, be careful about declaring capital losses in future years until you’ve paid out this entire tax-free balance. Any losses realized in later years can ultimately eliminate this credit.

In terms of calculating the tax bill on the net taxable capital gain, that portion is taxed at $50.67 per $100 in B.C., of which $30.67 is refundable and is credited to the NRDTOH (as of next year), while the other $20 is gone but not forgotten. If the company pays out 2.61 times more in ineligible dividends as its outstanding NRDTOH balance, then it would get back the full $30.67 / $100 it paid on the taxable gain, just like for interest income.

Summary: If your CCPC earns $100 in capital gains, net of its capital losses, $50 is tax-free and gets paid out tax-free to shareholders. The other $50 is taxed at 50.67%, resulting in a potential tax bill of $25.34, unless it pays out enough ineligible dividends. $12.67 is credited to the NRDTOH Account. If the CCPC pays out $40 ($12.67 x 2.61) in ineligible dividends, the company is only out of pocket $10 in taxes. Ultimately, it would pay out $90 in dividends, $50 tax-free capital dividends and $40 in ineligible divdiends.

If the shareholder receiving the dividends was otherwise earning $100,000 in taxable income, she would receive $50 in capital dividends tax-free while the other $40 in ineligible dividends would be taxed at 30.38%, or $12.15. She would ultimately keep $77.85 of the $100 originally received by her company.

Comparison: If the shareholder instead earned a $100 capital gain directly instead she would get $50 tax-free, with the other $50 taxed at 38.29% leaving behind $80.86 in after-tax money. This would leave her with about $3 more in her back pocket than if the gain had been earned corporately and then paid out as a combination of capital and ineligible dividends.

Return of Capital

Just like if earned in your non-registered portfolio, some investments pay out tax-free money to your company. Perhaps the two most common types are Corporate Class Mutual Funds or Real Estate Investment Trusts. Most payments from these investments are considered to be a return of your original capital or “ROC”.  Accordingly, since this money has already been taxed, the government doesn’t tax it again. This can be particularly valuable starting next year when active businesses earning more than $50,000 in investment income will be at risk of having to pay higher tax rates on business income since ROC income won’t be included as part of this calculation.

On the other hand, as the expression goes, there is no free lunch – although there is no immediate tax bill when you receive ROC, you will have to pay the piper when you sell your investments. When calculating your capital gain at that time, all your cumulative ROC payments are deducted from your original purchase price, which means paying a bigger capital gain tax bill. For example, if you own a REIT that cost you $10,000 and has paid you $2,000 of ROC before you sell it for $13,000, the $2,000 in ROC will be deducted from the $10,000 initial investment so that your capital gain will be calculated as $13,000 minus $8,000 or $5,000.

Likewise, if you own a rental property in your holdco or opco, you might be able to avoid pay tax on some of your rental earnings (and thus have extra tax-free money sitting in your company) by claiming depreciation of the building as a business expense even though you’re not actually paying this cost each year. When you sell your property down the road, you will have to settle up with the CRA if you’ve depreciated the building more than you get for it at the time of sale. For example, if you bought a property for $600,000, perhaps you spent $500,000 for the land and $100,000 for the building. If you’d depreciated the building down to $70,000 at sale but it was worth $120,000 at that time, you would have to pay back the $30,000 in depreciation (which would be fully taxed, rather than treated like a capital gain), as well as paying tax on the $20,000 increase in value from what you originally spent on the building.

Despite this eventual day of reckoning, investments that pay tax-free cash to your company allow your money to compound faster than money that is either taxed yearly at high corporate rates or forces you to pay it out in order to trigger a corporate tax refund when you’re in a high tax bracket. Quite simply, you’re left with more money to grow. As an added bonus, since you control when you trigger your capital gain bill, you can do so at a tax savvy time, such as when you’re in a low tax bracket or are once more allowed to income-split the money with a spouse under the new income-splitting rules. In other words, not only are capital gains far more tax efficient than interest and also better for taxpayers in higher tax brackets than taxable dividends, they provide extra savings by allowing you to trigger taxes during years when your tax bill might be lower.

On the other hand, return of capital may not be the best thing for you if you’re not planning on reinvesting the money inside the company.  Although the company gets the money tax-free and can pay out the full amount it receives, it will usually have to pay it out to its’ shareholders as a ineligible dividend unless it still has capital or eligible dividends that it hasn’t paid out or it still owes loans to shareholders. The tax bill will still be a lot less than for interest income, but it will be bigger than if you were earning eligible dividends and, in many cases, capital gains.

By way of explanation, this is because ROC payments are treated like the original after-tax business profits you were able to squirrel away in the first place for a rainy day. This was money that you were going to be taxed on upon withdrawal anyway since you were taxed on it at low business rate in the first place on the understanding that you’d to pay more tax on it personally upon withdrawal. Thus, this money isn’t taxed like income or capital gains, but as a withdrawal of your original business earnings and are taxed accordingly.

Along the same lines, you will face a similar situation most of the time when withdrawing other tax-paid money from your company. For example, when the $10,000 you might invest in a GIC is returned to you upon maturity and want to pay the money out to yourself as a dividend rather than reinvesting it corporately, your company would likewise get the money tax free but you’d likely be stuck paying tax personally on the $10,000 as an ineligible dividend.

Summary: If your CCPC earned $100 in ROC payments, it would keep the full amount. If reinvested, this provides a great opportunity for growing a bigger nest egg for the future. On the other hand, the $100 in ROC payments would eventually produce a $100 capital gain for the company in most cases, although this may be many years in the future. I’ve already shown how such a capital gain would be taxed earlier in this article.

If the shareholder received $100 in non-eligible dividends, he would pay $30.38 in personal taxes on the money, leaving him with $69.62 of the original $100.00 received by the company. At least he is receiving the full $100 as a dividend, unlike a dividend paid from $100 originally taxed as interest or a capital gain in your company, since no tax was deducted at the corporate level.

Comparison: If the shareholder received $100 of ROC personally, he would be left with the full $100. Like the company, however, he will likely have to pay tax on an extra $100 capital gain when he sells the investment that produced the $100 in ROC. Although it seems highly unfair that this investor pays no tax upfront on the $100 when received personally when he would have to pay 30% tax in this example when first earned by his company, low corporate tax rates allowed the company to squirrel away a lot more money to invest in the first place. The tax bill the shareholder pays now is what he avoided paying in the year that the company earned the money in business profits had the dividend been paid out then rather than invested inside the company. If the shareholder is in a lower rate now, he might actually be saving on that delayed tax bill.

 Conclusion

As you can hopefully see, after we put our calculators down and our headaches start to fade,  other than when receiving ROC, shareholders earning  and paying out their yearly corporate investment income are left in a similar position to where they’d be if they had earned the income personally, albeit perhaps sometimes slightly worse off. Their real advantage over their sole proprietor friends is that they have a lot more money to invest in the first place by investing business profits taxed only at as low as 12% corporately. The catch, and it is a big one, is that this all assumes your company pays out its yearly investment income. If it does not, then the government collects a rather large tax bill and holds that money until you pay out the profits and income in the future. That’s because the government doesn’t want to allow business owners to benefit from deferring the personal tax bill on their investments like they are able to do for business income.

By the same token, just like for people investing in their non-registered accounts, owning eligible-dividend-paying investments inside your company can still provide extremely tax-efficient income when flowed out to shareholders in lower tax brackets, but capital gains can be even more efficient for investors in higher tax brackets.

Unlike investing personally, however, the new tax rules may provide a few new wrinkles for business owners trying to pick corporate-owned investments. Some investors unable to income-split with a spouse until age 65 under the new rules may try to avoid taxable income now in order to take advantage of income-splitting opportunities later. Likewise, the new rules regarding more than $50,000 in passive corporate investment income may cause some investors to minimize high income investments if worried about losing all or some of their small business tax rate. Others with large unrealized capital gains may look at triggering some of the gains before the new rules kick in next year or will need to be careful about when they trigger them in the future when running an active business.

In conclusion, financial planning is often like an elaborate chessboard with bonus pieces and random rule changes that leave you scratching your head. The taxation of private companies is stellar example of this. Although mastering the rules of the game can’t guarantee success, I still like to think it usually leaves you a couple moves in front of the competition.