Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Legal’ Category

MoneyShow Toronto – Saturday, September 9, 2017

Canadian MoneySaver is pleased to bring together a select group of its expert columnists for a special full-day event at The MoneyShow Toronto 2017 aimed at helping you become a more informed, savvy, and profitable investor. From learning how to get the highest returns for your RRSPs and RRIFs, to maximizing your gains from dividend stocks and cutting your taxes to the bone, these experts will share their best money-saving and money-making opportunities with you.

I’ve been invited to speak again and for anyone wishing to attend in person or remotely, registration is free. Also, if you haven’t checked out this month’s Canadian Money Saver, it’s currently running my article on using Health Savings Accounts to help business owners pay their medical expenses tax efficiently, as well my comments in the “ask the experts section” on Income Trusts.

To register for this informative event, please click here:  http://www.torontomoneyshow.com/registration/main.asp?

 

 

Free Financial Planning Seminar – First of a Regular(ish) Series. Wednesday May 3 at 7 pm, Hillcrest Community Centre

Fortune cookie

One of my New Year’s Resolutions (besides various other pledges I would rather not discuss at this time)  was to do regular free seminars discussing  many different legal and financial planning topics.  Quite simply, I like talking to people about these things and want to help them learn more about the sorts of things that can save them or make them money, reduce stress and ultimately help them achieve their financial goals quicker and with less risk, while having lots of fun along the way.

Although March has gone and April is disappearing quickly, I have finally grasped the bull by the horns and booked the community room in the Vancouver Curling Club at Hillcrest Community Centre on May 3 at 7 pm. I thought I would start by doing the seminar I gave at the World Money Show last fall in Toronto on retirement planning. It’s designed to provide an overview on things ranging from CPP and OAS Pensions, RRSPs, Wills, Investments, Incapacity Planning and taxes.

I am actively looking for suggestions on future topics so please email me with anything you’re interested in learning about for a future session.

I have room for about 25 at this time and, if you’re interested, please let me know so I can plan ahead. The community room is by the North entrance to the community centre and involves taking a right up a flight of stairs almost as soon as you enter the building. The community room is inside of the lounge. As a bonus, there is free parking outside.

https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Hillcrest+Centre/@49.2438697,-123.1077187,15z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x6d023de767d004d0!8m2!3d49.2438697!4d-123.1077187

Why Volatility (and Roller Coasters) Are Best Suited for the Young in Years Rather than the Young at Heart

I used to love roller coasters. The rush of adrenaline and fear was intoxicating, especially since in the back of my mind I always knew both that it would all be over in a few minutes and the odds were pretty strong that I’d live to tell.  These days, this brief burst of joy isn’t worth the potential backache, nor that queasy feeling that just might lead to a chance reunion with what I had for lunch. While I haven’t completely lost my need for speed, I’ve learned to channel these urges into activities that both make for a more enjoyable ride and a far more pleasant aftermath.

I look at investment volatility in the same way – it’s decidedly a young man game. Or, more precisely, it’s something best suited for someone who has the time, risk tolerance and patience to wait for the roller coaster regain previous heights after that terrifying near-death feeling that accompanies that sickening downward plunge. Simply put, younger investors socking away money for retirement (as well as older investors living exclusively off their income rather than capital) have the time to wait out the ups and downs while chasing the higher potential returns that can go along with higher volatility investments if their investment acumen and good fortune align.

When investing, the basic premise seems to be that, by taking on more volatility and risk, you’ll do better in the long run. Although that certainly may be the case, the worse can also be true – you also have a bigger chance of things going horribly wrong. Volatility just means that you have a better chance of having an internal rate of return on your portfolio markedly higher or lower than the average. And which end of the stick you end up on actually depends a lot more on luck than perhaps the investment industry might wish you to believe.

It seems to be a common belief that more volatile investments will always provide you with more money over the long term because they might have higher “average rates of return”, which is perhaps the most common statistic used to weigh past investment performance. In other words, it is easy to believe that since more volatile asset classes or assets may a higher average rate of return over the long term, that you’ll always win in the end.  Unfortunately, the average rate of return is virtually useless in measuring whether your specific portfolio will make money (or how much) over the long term . . . or even if past investors did so!  Just because the average rate of return over 10 years may have been 7%, this not enough information to tell you whether or not someone who invested $1,000 dollars ten years ago actually has more or less money than when they started.

Consider this example – your broker tells you that your original $100,000 investment has generated an average rate of return of 0% over two years, net of costs.  Common wisdom would suggest that the investor would be able to call his broker at the two-year mark and withdraw $100,000 the next morning. On the other hand, pretend his $100,000 portfolio loses 40% in year one but makes 40% the next year. This result would produce a 0% average rate of return but our poor investor would still be down $16,000 or with an internal rate of return of -8% per year! This is because losing 40% of $100,000 has a far bigger impact on his bottom line (i.e. minus $40,000) than earning 40% on $60,000 the next year (i.e. plus $24,000).

In reality, the “sequence of returns” or the order of your good or bad years has a lot more to do with whether your portfolio will make money than the average rate of return. Even more dismaying, the higher the volatility of your portfolio, the less useful the average rate of return will be in telling you whether (and by how much) your portfolio actually gained or lost. Thus, when comparing portfolios that have different levels of volatility, looking at the average rates of return between them is like comparing apples to oranges.  Even if the higher volatility portfolio may have made more money over the long term (and this is not a given, as we’ve just seen), it may have exposed you to far more risk to do so. Accordingly, if the goal of retirement investing is to avoid financial ruin, taking on a portfolio with slightly lower past returns but significantly lower volatility (often measured as “standard deviation”) may ultimately be a far better decision.

By the way, if you’re looking at a meaningful statistic to measure past performance, look at the “compound average rate of return” or simply cut to the chase and compare the examples now commonly given on investment statements that show the current value of an original $1,000 investment compared to how similar investments have performed over the same time period. For those worried about large withdrawals or deposits skewing the results, look into “money-weighted returns” that is a lot like the internal rate of return I mentioned earlier but it takes into account when money goes in and out of the portfolio.

Returning to importance of the sequence of returns, the best way to see their impact is by way of example, first produced by Associate Professor Moshe Milevsky, who is recognized in Canada as perhaps the expert on retirement math. Assume there are five investors, all of whom just turned 65 and have $100,000 portfolios with a 7% average rate of return, from which each investor withdraws $750 per month until the portfolio has been depleted.  The baseline portfolio earns a constant 7% per year, while the other four portfolios use a repeating three-year cycle that also average 7% but with gets there by earning 7% in one year, 27% in another and -13% in the third, although each of the four alternative portfolios varies the order or sequence of the good and bad years as follows:

Scenario A 7%, -13%, 27%;
Scenario B 7%, 27%, -13%;
Scenario C -13%, 7%, 27%; and
Scenario D 27%, 7%, -13%;

Ultimately, the results for the 5 examples varied wildly. While the “Steady-Eddy” fixed 7% return client had enough money to last until age 86.5, a client unfortunate enough to hit retirement just when the markets were about to crater (Scenario C) ran out of money a full 5 years sooner, while someone who retired a year later and had the same size beginning portfolio would have enough money to last until she was over 94 years of age! In other words, by simply varying the order in which the market had good and bad years, the sample client’s retirement was either one where he was out of cash as early as age 81 or still with money in the bank at age 94!

Thinking about this in practical terms, there are a few lessons to take away from this example. First, volatility is even more impactful when an investor is in retirement and using their savings to pay the bills rather than just living on the interest, dividends and other types of income the portfolio might produce. In other words, the effects of volatility are magnified when retirees are forced to sell low in order to put food on the table. Having to sell a stock when it is down 20% from the year means the following:

  • You are essentially experiencing a 25% cost of living adjustment for that year, as the groceries you could have bought last year for $100 by selling 4 shares worth $25 each now require you to sell 5 shares now valued at $20. Thus, you had to sell 5 rather than 4 shares to buy your Special K and Hamburger Helper.
  • By selling that extra share, you also lose the dividends on that share, which means having to sell more shares in the future in order pay for future groceries since the less income generated from the remaining portfolio, the more capital that needs to be sold to pay the bills. This, in turn, will further reduce the income produced by the portfolio so that effects of having to sell that extra share in this year will continue to snowball into the future.
  • There is one less share to benefit when the stock market bounces back, which means that the rest of the portfolio would have to grow by that much more in order to make up lost ground.

Thus, putting this all together, the message is clear: while the sequence of returns is important to all investors, it’s even more vital to those in retirement who are drawing down their capital.  Accordingly, my message to clients approaching retirement on track to hit their financial goals is a simple one – volatility is not your friend.  Owning a portfolio with less volatility, even if it means potentially leaving money on the table during times when the market roars, is far more important than chasing after investment gains that you simply do not need when the consequences of things going wrong can be catastrophic.

Although it is time to wrap things up for now, I do want to end things on a more positive note that the dire words and somber tone of the preceding paragraphs. In writing this article, I realized that I have a  lot more to say. As a result, be forewarned – I plan on writing a series on investing during retirement that will be far more focused on the happy ending. Rather than telling you what can go wrong, I would much rather talk about what you can do to make things go right. And there are many steps you can take. But that is a story for another day.

Trust for Investment Income

Using A Discretionary Family Trust to Pay for Your Minor Children or Grandchildren’s Expenses

Life in the Lower Mainland is expensive these days, particularly if raising children with significant expenses, like private school tuition, sports fees, activity costs or medical issues. Although it may not always be possible to reduce these expenses directly, it may be possible to make these costs more affordable in another way, through income tax savings. Using a trust to income split investment income so it is taxed on your children, grandchildren or spouse’s tax returns rather than your own is one way to achieve this goal, provided it is done correctly so that you don’t run afoul of the Income Tax Act.

For example, instead of having eligible dividends from Canadian investments taxed at 31.3% if your taxable income exceeds $200,000, what about being able to earn over $50,000 in such dividends tax-free when taxed in the hands of someone without any other taxable income? Or, if diverting interest income from a high earner to a child with no earnings, the tax savings from reporting $10,000 on the child’s tax return could be as much as $4,780. Although there is a cost to setting up and maintaining Trusts, as well as some administrative work, the savings more than justify the effort and expense in many cases. Read on to learn more.

How a Trust Works

In basic terms, a trust is a legal relationship where one person (“the Settlor”) gives property to another person (“the Trustee”) to manage for the benefit of others (“the Beneficiaries”). As well, sometimes, there is also someone else in charge of keeping an eye on the Trustee and potentially picking replacement Trustees (“the Protector” or “the Appointer”).

Due to our tax rules, it is usually required to have someone else as the Settlor than one of the Beneficiaries if the Settlor wants to potentially receive money from the Trust.  A family friend or another relative who is not a Beneficiary are good choices. The Settlor’s only role is to provide a silver coin or ingot and sign the document creating the trust, which specifies the Trustee, the Beneficiaries and how the Trust is to be operated. The wealthy family member with the money to invest is usually named as one of the Trustees, as well as one of the Beneficiaries. Other beneficiaries include the spouse, children and grandchildren of any age and potentially other relatives who might receive payments from the Trust. The document creating the Trust gives the Trustee complete discretion each year to decide how any income or capital gains earned inside the Trust are to be distributed. In other words, it is the Trustee that really controls the Trust and he can decide exactly who gets how much each year, including himself, in order to get the best tax results and the best use of the money.

As you may have noticed, there is still a missing piece of the puzzle. Although the Settlor contributed a silver coin or ingot to fund the Trust, how does the Trust acquire an investment portfolio with such a small contribution? This is where the wealthy family member plays a role. He lends the Trust money at the prescribed government rate, currently 1% per year which can be locked in for life. Without the lending family member charging and collecting interest, the Income Tax Act will not allow income splitting with spouses or minor children / grandchildren.  By January 30th each year, the Trust must pay the lender the interest owing for the previous year, which he declares as interest income on his tax return, although the Trust can claim this as a deductible expense. Provided that this is done, the Trustee can then allocate any income or gains earned in the Trust for that year as he likes among the Beneficiaries, who report this on their own tax returns and are taxed on it at their rates, which is where the savings arise.

The Trustee can continue to operate the Trust for at least 80 years, although these types of trusts are often wound up far sooner, such as when the lender spouse dies or when the children are finished university. Moreover, every 21 years, any unrealized capital gains on assets owned by the trust are taxed, which means that the Trust is often wrapped up at this point. When the Trustee wants to wind up the Trust, the Trust repays the loan by liquidating enough of the investments to do so and the Trustee

decides how to divide the remainder among the Beneficiaries. If there are any assets in the trust with unrealized gains at that time that haven’t been liquidated, the Trustee can transfer them to any of the Beneficiaries without triggering tax, although that person would now own the asset with the same cost and unrealized capital gain as was the case when owned by the Trust.

Additional Steps to Get the Trust Up and Running

After the Trust has been drafted by the lawyer and signed by the Settlor and Trustee, there still remains some work to be done, both to get the Trust functioning as intended, and to also keep up with ongoing administrative requirements. The first step is usually sending off a copy of the Trust to the CRA along with the following form http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pbg/tf/t3app/README.html in order to get a Trust Number, which is the Trust’s identity for tax purposes. This number will be needed for income tax purposes each year but most financial institutions will also require this number before opening up an investment (and potentially a bank account) for the Trust.

Once this number has been received, the investor can proceed to make the investment loan to the Trust. The Trustee signs a Director’s Resolution (a document used to record decisions made by the Trustee) confirming the decision to take out this loan. The Trustee and investor sign the loan documents, the investor writes the Trust a cheque, which gets deposited in the Trust’s investment account so the Trust can invest it and start making money.  Either the Trustee can make the investment decisions directly or, as specified in most Trusts, he can delegate this to a professional investment advisor.

The Trustee will probably need to set up a separate bank account for the Trust, out of which it will write cheques when paying expenses or sending money to the Beneficiaries. It is a wise idea for the Trustee to get copies of all cancelled cheques and to get receipts from the Beneficiaries confirming payment.

Ongoing Requirements

Other than handling the investment portfolio directly or consulting with the person hired to do this for the Trust, the Trustee has other administrative tasks to attend to from time to time. Your lawyer and accountant can help the Trustee with these, particularly during the first year or so, after which you may wish to do a lot on your own.

First, prior to the end of each year, the Trustee must decide how to allocate money among the Beneficiaries or to the Trust (although it usually makes sense to tax income to the Beneficiaries). This is done by signing a separate Trustee’s Resolution that specifies who gets what, which can be done by stating dollar amounts or by allocating percentages to the different beneficiaries.

The Trustee will also need to work with a tax preparer to file a return for the Trust showing the realized capital gains and earned income, although most Trusts seldom have to pay any taxes directly. All the Beneficiaries will have to report taxable income received by the Trust on their own returns. For minor Beneficiaries receiving no other income, it might be the difference between them having to file a return or not.

The parents or guardians of minor Beneficiaries will also need to track the money received for the minors and how it is spent, preferably keeping the relevant receipts. Likewise, if any money is payable to that Beneficiary but not actually paid out, the Trustee needs to prepare the Demand Promissory Note to document the loan and give it to the Beneficiary (if an adult) or his guardian prior to yearend.

In some cases, the investor may wish to loan the trust more money in the future, in which case an additional Director’s Resolution and loan documents will be required. If making other major decisions, like adding or deleting Beneficiaries if allowed by document creating the Trust, winding up the trust or adding additional or new Trustees, additional Trustee’s Resolutions or similar documents may be required.

Finally, the Trustee must account to the Beneficiaries from time to time for how the Trust is operated. This requires essentially showing the trust’s income and expenses. This should be done within the first two years after the Trust is in existence and then more sporadically thereafter. It’s been suggested that this be done every 3 to 5 years. If a Beneficiary disputes the charges, he can get the Trustee to do a formal passing of accounts before a Registrar of the Court, although this is extremely uncommon for Trusts set up for this purpose.